Defense Counsel
Organization
5% confidence
high confidence (organization): Defense Counsel a legal entity
Statistics
- Mentions: 50
- Documents: 50
- First Found: 059.pdf
Document Mentions (50)
| Document | Volume | Page | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 059.pdf | - | 71 | stigation ............................................ 20 5. October 2006- February 2007: Epstein's Defense Counsel Initiate Contact with Villafana, Lourie, and Sloman, and Press for a Meeting .......... |
| 059.pdf | - | 72 | o Meet with Epstein's New Attorneys ............................. 59 2. Leading to the Meeting with Defense Counsel, Investigative Steps Are Postponed, and the Defense Continues to Oppose Villafana's ... |
| 059.pdf | - | 73 | r the Victims .................................................... 94 F. Despite Affirming the NPA, Defense Counsel Intensify Their Challenges to It and Accuse Villafana oflmproper Conduct .............. |
| 059.pdf | - | 76 | NOT A CERTIFIED COPY D. OPR Does Not Find That the Subjects' Preexisting Relationships with Defense Counsel, Decisions to Meet with Defense Counsel, and Other Factors Established That the Subjects Act... |
| 059.pdf | - | 103 | ransactions. The case agent viewed the case as "strong." 5. October 2006 - February 2007: Epstein's Defense Counsel Initiate Contact with Villafana, Lourie, and Sloman, and Press for a Meeting Just as... |
| 059.pdf | - | 105 | ecise crimes the USAO intended to charge, which Villafana did not want to reveal. 6. February 2007: Defense Counsel Meet with Lourie and Villafana and Present the Defense Objections to a Federal Case ... |
| 059.pdf | - | 111 | ictment drastically different from the current draft?" Sloman responded only, "Taken care of."46 D. Defense Counsel Seek a Meeting with Senior USAO Managers, which Villafana Opposes Meanwhile, Epstein... |
| 059.pdf | - | 114 | ibility issues were generic rather than tied to specific victims. F. The June 26, 2007 Meeting with Defense Counsel Menchel agreed to meet with defense counsel on June 26, 2007, communicating directly... |
| 059.pdf | - | 141 | whether the Department might direct the USAO to "drop this case."96 2. Leading to the Meeting with Defense Counsel, Investigative Steps Are Postponed, and the Defense Continues to Oppose Villafafia's ... |
| 059.pdf | - | 145 | ages. We also put in deadlines for a plea and sentencing date." B. September 12, 2007: The USAO and Defense Counsel Meet with the State Attorney Although the USAO and defense counsel had been discussi... |
| 059.pdf | - | 154 | y reply email, Villafana asked Lourie to call her, but there is no record of whether they spoke. F. Defense Counsel Offers New Proposals Substantially Changing the Terms of the Federal Plea Agreement,... |
| 059.pdf | - | 179 | ce "Affirmation" of the NP A and its addendum, signed by Epstein. 154 F. Despite Affirming the NPA, Defense Counsel Intensify Their Challenges to It and Accuse Villafana of Improper Conduct 1. Decembe... |
| 059.pdf | - | 180 | New USAO Criminal Chief Begins a Full Review of the Evidence, and Acosta Agrees to Meet Again with Defense Counsel After reviewing Starr's and Lefkowitz's letters, Sloman notified Villafana that "in l... |
| 059.pdf | - | 231 | e NPA for Epstein's benefit. D. OPR Does Not Find That the Subjects' Preexisting Relationships with Defense Counsel, Decisions to Meet with Defense Counsel, and Other Factors Established That the Subj... |
| 059.pdf | - | 232 | attorneys he had selected to represent him. 2. The Subjects Asserted That Their Relationships with Defense Counsel Did Not Influence Their Actions Acosta, Menchel, Sloman, and Lourie each asserted tha... |
| 059.pdf | - | 236 | to one of Epstein's attorneys. E. The Evidence Does Not Establish That the Subjects' Meetings with Defense Counsel Were Improper Benefits to Epstein OPR considered whether decisions by Acosta, Sloman,... |
| 059.pdf | - | 241 | Evidence Does Not Establish That Acosta Negotiated a Deal Favorable to Epstein over Breakfast with Defense Counsel OPR separately considered the circumstances of one specific meeting that has been the... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 16 | stigation ............................................20 5. October 2006 – February 2007: Epstein’s Defense Counsel Initiate Contact with Villafaña, Lourie, and Sloman, and Press for a Meeting .......... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 17 | to Meet with Epstein’s New Attorneys .............................59 2. Leading to the Meeting with Defense Counsel, Investigative Steps Are Postponed, and the Defense Continues to Oppose Villafaña’s ... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 18 | or the Victims ....................................................94 F. Despite Affirming the NPA, Defense Counsel Intensify Their Challenges to It and Accuse Villafaña of Improper Conduct ............. |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 21 | xix D. OPR Does Not Find That the Subjects’ Preexisting Relationships with Defense Counsel, Decisions to Meet with Defense Counsel, and Other Factors Established That the Subjects Acted from |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 48 | ransactions. The case agent viewed the case as “strong.” 5. October 2006 – February 2007: Epstein’s Defense Counsel Initiate Contact with Villafaña, Lourie, and Sloman, and Press for a Meeting Just as... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 50 | ecise crimes the USAO intended to charge, which Villafaña did not want to reveal. 6. February 2007: Defense Counsel Meet with Lourie and Villafaña and Present the Defense Objections to a Federal Case ... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 56 | ictment drastically different from the current draft?” Sloman responded only, “Taken care of.”46 D. Defense Counsel Seek a Meeting with Senior USAO Managers, which Villafaña Opposes Meanwhile, Epstein... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 59 | ibility issues were generic rather than tied to specific victims. F. The June 26, 2007 Meeting with Defense Counsel Menchel agreed to meet with defense counsel on June 26, 2007, communicating directly... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 86 | whether the Department might direct the USAO to “drop this case.”96 2. Leading to the Meeting with Defense Counsel, Investigative Steps Are Postponed, and the Defense Continues to Oppose Villafaña’s E... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 90 | ages. We also put in deadlines for a plea and sentencing date.” B. September 12, 2007: The USAO and Defense Counsel Meet with the State Attorney Although the USAO and defense counsel had been discussi... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 99 | y reply email, Villafaña asked Lourie to call her, but there is no record of whether they spoke. F. Defense Counsel Offers New Proposals Substantially Changing the Terms of the Federal Plea Agreement,... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 124 | ence “Affirmation” of the NPA and its addendum, signed by Epstein.154 F. Despite Affirming the NPA, Defense Counsel Intensify Their Challenges to It and Accuse Villafaña of Improper Conduct 1. Decembe... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 125 | New USAO Criminal Chief Begins a Full Review of the Evidence, and Acosta Agrees to Meet Again with Defense Counsel After reviewing Starr’s and Lefkowitz’s letters, Sloman notified Villafaña that “in l... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 176 | e NPA for Epstein’s benefit. D. OPR Does Not Find That the Subjects’ Preexisting Relationships with Defense Counsel, Decisions to Meet with Defense Counsel, and Other Factors Established That the Subj... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 177 | attorneys he had selected to represent him. 2. The Subjects Asserted That Their Relationships with Defense Counsel Did Not Influence Their Actions Acosta, Menchel, Sloman, and Lourie each asserted tha... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 181 | to one of Epstein’s attorneys. E. The Evidence Does Not Establish That the Subjects’ Meetings with Defense Counsel Were Improper Benefits to Epstein OPR considered whether decisions by Acosta, Sloman,... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 186 | Evidence Does Not Establish That Acosta Negotiated a Deal Favorable to Epstein over Breakfast with Defense Counsel OPR separately considered the circumstances of one specific meeting that has been the... |
| EFTA00009654.pdf | VOL00007 | 1 | the Government, the defendant ("Defendant"), and/or to the defendant's criminal defense attorneys ("Defense Counsel,' and 1 EFTA00009654 |
| EFTA00009658.pdf | VOL00007 | 2 | losed to Defense Staff, Defense Experts/Advisors, Other Authorized Persons, or Potential Witnesses, Defense Counsel shall instruct such individual(s) of the terms of this Order and that such individua... |
| EFTA00009658.pdf | VOL00007 | 3 | ling absent contrary order of the Court. 8. Confidential Information disclosed to the defendant, or Defense Counsel, respectively, during the course of proceedings in this action: a) Shall be used by ... |
| EFTA00009658.pdf | VOL00007 | 4 | 0490-RMB Document 37-1 Filed 07/25/19 Page 7 of 9 c) Shall not be possessed outside the presence of Defense Counsel, or maintained, by the Defendant; d) Shall be made available for inspection by Defen... |
| EFTA00009658.pdf | VOL00007 | 5 | 13. The foregoing provisions shall remain in effect unless and until either (a) the Government and Defense Counsel mutually agree otherwise, or (b) this Order is modified by further order of the Court... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 2 | ery disclosed to the defendant ("Defendant") and/or to the defendant's criminal defense attorneys ("Defense Counsel") during the course of proceedings in this action: a) Shall be used by the Defendant... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 3 | xpert, legal advisor, consultant, or any other individual retained or employed by the Defendant and Defense Counsel for the purpose of assisting in the defense of this case ("Defense Experts/Advisors"... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 4 | such acknowledgments shall be retained by Defense Counsel and shall be subject to in camera review by the Court if good cause for review is demonstrated. The |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 5 | the identity of any victims or witnesses referenced in the Discovery. This Order does not prohibit Defense Counsel or Defense Staff from referencing the identities of individuals they believe may be r... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 6 | lf publicly as such on the record in this case shall not be treated as Confidential Information. 9. Defense Counsel may, at any time, notify the Government that Defense Counsel does not concur in the ... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 7 | ing absent contrary order of the Court. 10. Confidential Information disclosed to the defendant, or Defense Counsel, respectively, during the course of proceedings in this action: a) Shall be used by ... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 8 | ment 36 Filed 07/30/20 Page 8 of 12 e) Shall be reviewed by the Defendant solely in the presence of Defense Counsel or when provided access to Discovery materials in electronic format by BOP officials... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 9 | de, partially-nude, or otherwise sexualized images, videos, or other depictions of individuals. 13. Defense Counsel may, at any time, notify the Government that Defense Counsel does not concur in the ... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 10 | /30/20 Page 10 of 12 b) Shall not be disseminated, transmitted, or otherwise copied and provided to Defense Counsel or the Defendant; c) Shall be reviewed by the Defendant solely in the presence of De... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 11 | AJN Document 36 Filed 07/30/20 Page 11 of 12 publicly available or obtained by the Defendant or her Defense Counsel from a source other than the Government. 17. Except for Discovery that has been made... |
| EFTA00009664.pdf | VOL00007 | 12 | Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 36 Filed 07/30/20 Page 12 of 12 Defense Counsel may make an appropriate application to the Court for any such modifications. SO ORDERED: Dated: New |