Ken Starr

possible_person 18 mentions 50% confidence

Document Mentions (18)

Preview Document Volume Page Context
Page 140 059.pdf - 140 ntered Acosta's office as Acosta was finishing a phone conversation, and Acosta stated, "[T]hat was Ken Starr," and told Menchel the call related to t...
Page 232 059.pdf - 232 f the attorneys [ ] [became] something to consider. I think that the ability of Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz to convince Alex Acost...
Page 409 059.pdf - 409 20 21 22 23 24 25 BY MR. KUVIN: Q Never gave you an explanation on that? A No. Q You know the name Ken Starr? A Yes. Q Did you learn that name with re...
Page 85 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf - 85 ntered Acosta’s office as Acosta was finishing a phone conversation, and Acosta stated, “[T]hat was Ken Starr,” and told Menchel the call related to t...
Page 177 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf - 177 torneys [ ] [became] something to consider. . . . . I think that the ability of Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz to convince Alex Acost...
Page 34 EFTA00009016.pdf VOL00007 34 il, I accept that it happened. 17 Q So, what had been your knowledge and relationship 18 of -- with Ken Starr of Kirkland S Ellis -- 19 A Right. 20 Q ...
Page 35 EFTA00009016.pdf VOL00007 35 ening years, socially or professionally? 17 A Off and on, I was in Washington. They -- you know, 18 Ken Starr was in Washington. I think III had moved...
Page 41 EFTA00009016.pdf VOL00007 41 s my recollection. 23 Q Okay. So, is it fair to say it was more of a 24 presentation on the part of Ken Starr and his side rather 2; than a debate or ...
Page 42 EFTA00009016.pdf VOL00007 42 pposed to evidence, is that accurate? 6 A I believe that's accurate, yes. 7 Q And in your letter to Ken Starr dated -- the letter 8 is actually not da...
Page 44 EFTA00009016.pdf VOL00007 44 Page 243 1 Q So, was -- I mean, Ken Starr is of course well 2 known. 3 A Right. 4 Q He was solicitor general, he's -- you know, 5 etcetera. D
Page 1 EFTA00009116.pdf VOL00007 1 at issue. 13 Do you -- are you -- are you aware that MI received a copy of the NPA in November when Ken Starr wrote a letter to asking her to review t...
Page 29 EFTA00009116.pdf VOL00007 29 h is the -- your sort of 14 ill-fated NPA addendum effort. 15 THE WITNESS No. No, a letter to -- to Ken Starr 16 that I -- that I wrote. But -- 17 MR....
Page 31 EFTA00009116.pdf VOL00007 31 at 6 the request for a review by the criminal division, that comes 7 later. This is in response to Ken Starr's letter to 8 about -- raising 22.55 -- 2...
Page 37 EFTA00009116.pdf VOL00007 37 have it right here. It's not marked as an 12 exhibit, but this is an letter to Jay Lefkowitz and 13 Ken Starr dated -- 14 A Right. 15 Q -- June 23, 20...
Page 94 EFTA00009116.pdf VOL00007 94 case at the time. 13 Q All right, and what about with respect to that same 14 process on your part, Ken Starr, who actually was a dean of a 15 law sch...
Page 97 EFTA00009116.pdf VOL00007 97 y of legal 10 superstars, Harvard Professor Dershowitz, former judge and 11 then Pepperdine lodging Ken Starr, former deputy assistant to 12 the presi...
Page 5 EFTA00009229.pdf VOL00007 5 orneys 15 that you were seeking employment with Kirkland S Ellis, a 16 firm of which two attorneys, Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz had 17 been representi...
Page 85 EFTA00009329.pdf VOL00007 85 m. 16 Q In the sense that you only met with the defense 17 team for the first time in the person of Ken Starr and Jay 18 Lefkowitz and company on the ...
No images found for this person. Images are detected through:
  • Celebrity face recognition (Amazon Rekognition)
  • Name mentions in image text/captions