Acosta exercised poor judgment
location 13 mentions 60% confidence
Also known as: ACOSTA EXERCISED POOR JUDGMENT
Document Mentions (13)
| Document | Volume | Page | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 059.pdf | - | 68 | s decision was within his authority and did not constitute professional misconduct, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment when he failed t... |
| 059.pdf | - | 250 | R finds that none of the subjects committed professional misconduct in this matter, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment when he agreed t... |
| 059.pdf | - | 251 | all of the available evidence and the totality of the then-existing circumstances, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment in that he chose ... |
| 059.pdf | - | 268 | rosecutors and whether any reasonable measure of justice was achieved. Accordingly, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment in that he chose... |
| 059.pdf | - | 346 | her to notify victims of Epstein's state guilty pleas and sentencing. However, OPR also concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment because by faili... |
| 059.pdf | - | 366 | s decision was within his authority and did not constitute professional misconduct, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment when he failed t... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report Executive Summary.pdf | - | 12 | s decision was within his authority and did not constitute professional misconduct, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment when he failed t... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 13 | s decision was within his authority and did not constitute professional misconduct, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment when he failed t... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 195 | R finds that none of the subjects committed professional misconduct in this matter, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment when he agreed t... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 196 | all of the available evidence and the totality of the then-existing circumstances, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment in that he chose ... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 213 | rosecutors and whether any reasonable measure of justice was achieved. Accordingly, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment in that he chose... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 291 | her to notify victims of Epstein’s state guilty pleas and sentencing. However, OPR also concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment because by faili... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 311 | s decision was within his authority and did not constitute professional misconduct, OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment when he failed t... |