Sloman

location 50 mentions 60% confidence

Also known as: SLOMAN

Document Mentions (50)

Document	Volume	Page	Context
059.pdf	-	100	he Leap Year investigation, he likewise was unaware of Epstein. On July 24, 2006, Villafana emailed to Sloman a link to a Palm Beach Post article that...
059.pdf	-	102	e involvement in supervising the Epstein investigation, and at times, Villafana directed her emails to Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie without copying her...
059.pdf	-	104	been a Deputy Chief of the USAO's Major Crimes section at the time Menchel was the Chief. According to Sloman's contemporaneous email recounting the c...
059.pdf	-	126	tain the evidence, defense counsel continued to oppose her efforts. 70 Menchel forwarded this email to Sloman. 71 Villafana told OPR that she later sp...
059.pdf	-	129	on or before July 26, 2007. On that afternoon, Villafana met in Miami with Menchel. She told OPR that Sloman, as well as the FBI case agents and their...
059.pdf	-	131	the accuracy and completeness of the information upon which the sentencing decisions will be based. In Sloman's view, Menchel and Lourie were "two of ...
059.pdf	-	132	owing day, July 31, 2007, Villafana emailed a one-page "Terms of Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement" to Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie. Villafana told OPR...
059.pdf	-	137	l forwarded the redraft to Acosta, suggesting that they speak about it the next morning, as well as to Sloman, Lourie, and Villafana. The final letter...
059.pdf	-	140	ze a bit. We are not changing positions, and that should be made clear." The next day, Acosta wrote to Sloman: [Epstein's] attorneys want to go to DC ...
059.pdf	-	143	ana's email to Acosta with a note that read simply, "fyi." Later that evening, Villafana circulated to Sloman, Lourie, and Oosterbaan two alternative ...
059.pdf	-	145	e USAO would be prepared to proceed with the litigation concerning the computers the following day. At Sloman' s direction, Villafana asked the court ...
059.pdf	-	163	10:26 p.m., Lefkowitz asked Lourie to phone him. The next day, Lefkowitz emailed Acosta-with copies to Sloman, Lourie, and Villafana- to "follow up on...
059.pdf	-	169	ntment of the selected attorney and the settlement process." Villafana forwarded Lefkowitz's letter to Sloman, complaining that the defense interpreta...
059.pdf	-	174	concerning her initial selection of the private attorney to assist the victims. Villafana explained to Sloman: The funny thing is that I had never met...
059.pdf	-	176	e believe is the unprecedented nature of the section 2255 component" of the NP A. After Lourie sent to Sloman a copy of the Starr letter, Sloman forwa...
059.pdf	-	188	ctims confirmed "that represented Epstein victims. The Epstein defense team alleged in the letter that Sloman's past association with the attorney cau...
059.pdf	-	191	sonment, which means confinement twenty-four hours a day at the County Jail." In a subsequent email to Sloman, Villafana recounted that she had spoken...
059.pdf	-	195	Office placed him into the work release program, permitting him to leave the Stockade 179 According to Sloman, Krischer explained that even without re...
059.pdf	-	196	recusal was formally approved by the Department on December 8, 2008. 184 Black forwarded the email to Sloman, noting that Villafana "is very concerned...
059.pdf	-	233	former colleagues "was that we would give them process, but we didn't pull any punches with them." In Sloman's view, preexisting relationships with de...
059.pdf	-	241	ues was ultimately resolved in a way that materially changed the key provisions of the NP A. First, at Sloman's instigation, the USAO sought to change...
059.pdf	-	258	d by Villafana, telling OPR, "I had not heard of that." However, the contemporaneous records show that Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie had each been aware...
059.pdf	-	294	tter should come from the attorney representative rather than the government. On November 28, 2007, at Sloman's instruction, Villafana provided Lefkow...
059.pdf	-	312	al misconduct did not rise to a level that would undermine such a decision. Immediately thereafter, at Sloman's instruction, Villafana notified Lefkow...
059.pdf	-	346	to appear at the state plea hearing. Villafana and Sloman exchanged edits of the draft letter and, at Sloman's instruction, she provided the draft to ...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	45	he Leap Year investigation, he likewise was unaware of Epstein. On July 24, 2006, Villafaña emailed to Sloman a link to a Palm Beach Post article that...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	47	e involvement in supervising the Epstein investigation, and at times, Villafaña directed her emails to Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie without copying her...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	49	been a Deputy Chief of the USAO’s Major Crimes section at the time Menchel was the Chief. According to Sloman’s contemporaneous email recounting the c...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	71	tain the evidence, defense counsel continued to oppose her efforts. 70 Menchel forwarded this email to Sloman. 71 Villafaña told OPR that she later sp...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	74	on or before July 26, 2007. On that afternoon, Villafaña met in Miami with Menchel. She told OPR that Sloman, as well as the FBI case agents and their...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	76	accuracy and completeness of the information upon which the sentencing decisions will be based. 81 In Sloman’s view, Menchel and Lourie were “two of t...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	77	owing day, July 31, 2007, Villafaña emailed a one-page “Terms of Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement” to Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie. Villafaña told OPR...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	82	l forwarded the redraft to Acosta, suggesting that they speak about it the next morning, as well as to Sloman, Lourie, and Villafaña. The final letter...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	85	ze a bit. We are not changing positions, and that should be made clear.” The next day, Acosta wrote to Sloman: [Epstein’s] attorneys want to go to DC ...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	88	aña’s email to Acosta with a note that read simply, “fyi.” Later that evening, Villafaña circulated to Sloman, Lourie, and Oosterbaan two alternative ...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	90	e USAO would be prepared to proceed with the litigation concerning the computers the following day. At Sloman’s direction, Villafaña asked the court t...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	108	10:26 p.m., Lefkowitz asked Lourie to phone him. The next day, Lefkowitz emailed Acosta—with copies to Sloman, Lourie, and Villafaña— to “follow up on...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	114	ntment of the selected attorney and the settlement process.” Villafaña forwarded Lefkowitz’s letter to Sloman, complaining that the defense interpreta...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	119	concerning her initial selection of the private attorney to assist the victims. Villafaña explained to Sloman: The funny thing is that I had never met...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	121	we believe is the unprecedented nature of the section 2255 component” of the NPA. After Lourie sent to Sloman a copy of the Starr letter, Sloman forwa...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	133	ctims confirmed “that represented Epstein victims. The Epstein defense team alleged in the letter that Sloman’s past association with the attorney cau...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	136	sonment, which means confinement twenty-four hours a day at the County Jail.” In a subsequent email to Sloman, Villafaña recounted that she had spoken...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	140	Office placed him into the work release program, permitting him to leave the Stockade 179 According to Sloman, Krischer explained that even without re...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	141	recusal was formally approved by the Department on December 8, 2008. 184 Black forwarded the email to Sloman, noting that Villafaña “is very concerned...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	178	former colleagues “was that we would give them process, but we didn’t pull any punches with them.” In Sloman’s view, preexisting relationships with de...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	186	sues was ultimately resolved in a way that materially changed the key provisions of the NPA. First, at Sloman’s instigation, the USAO sought to change...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	203	d by Villafaña, telling OPR, “I had not heard of that.” However, the contemporaneous records show that Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie had each been aware...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	239	tter should come from the attorney representative rather than the government. On November 28, 2007, at Sloman’s instruction, Villafaña provided Lefkow...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	257	al misconduct did not rise to a level that would undermine such a decision. Immediately thereafter, at Sloman’s instruction, Villafaña notified Lefkow...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	291	to appear at the state plea hearing. Villafaña and Sloman exchanged edits of the draft letter and, at Sloman’s instruction, she provided the draft to ...