Menchel

location 42 mentions 60% confidence

Also known as: MENCHEL

Document Mentions (42)

Document	Volume	Page	Context
059.pdf	-	107	IFIED COPY forward with charges in this case. Lourie forwarded a copy of the prosecution memorandum to Menchel. Laurie's transmittal message read: Mar...
059.pdf	-	108	f the discussions. Sloman told OPR that because of his broad responsibilities as F AUSA, he left it to Menchel, as a highly experienced trial attorney...
059.pdf	-	110	n discuss after that." Later that afternoon, Villafana sent Lourie an email, which Lourie forwarded to Menchel, explaining that a "conservative calcul...
059.pdf	-	111	al investigation and a meeting with senior USAO managers, including Acosta. In a May 10, 2007 email to Menchel, Lourie reported that Epstein's attorne...
059.pdf	-	112	s counsel before filing charges, and suggesting that Epstein's counsel make their next presentation to Menchel. Although Lourie's emails show that he ...
059.pdf	-	114	he did not recall Villafana ever articulating a concern that Epstein was continuing to offend, and in Menchel's view, Epstein was "already under a mic...
059.pdf	-	115	ed the state's case and would "have a significant impact on any federal prosecution."52 Lourie sent to Menchel, with a copy to Villafana, an email div...
059.pdf	-	124	had not been given an opportunity to respond to those concerns. 69 A week later, Villafana replied to Menchel's email, reiterating her concerns about ...
059.pdf	-	127	lafana's efforts to obtain the computer equipment. In May 2007, following the plan she had outlined to Menchel, Villafana initiated action requiring p...
059.pdf	-	128	tion," and to send "whatever and whoever you need" to assist. 74 Villafana forwarded Black's letter to Menchel, explaining the circumstances relating ...
059.pdf	-	133	that required him to register as a sexual offender; however, sex offender status was also mentioned in Menchel's July 3, 2007 email to Villafana recou...
059.pdf	-	136	of the defense team, Sanchez followed up on the July 31, 2007 meeting with an August 2, 2007 letter to Menchel: We welcomed your recognition that a st...
059.pdf	-	137	to Sloman, Lourie, and Villafana. The final letter, as shown on the following pages, was identical to Menchel' s redraft, except that it omitted all r...
059.pdf	-	144	RM OF IMPRISONMENT IS REDUCED Acosta had dispensed with the August 17, 2007 plea deadline specified in Menchel's August 3, 2007 letter, in order to al...
059.pdf	-	215	PR did not find a violation of a clear and unambiguous standard as discussed below, OPR concludes that Menchel, Sloman, Lourie, and Villafana did not ...
059.pdf	-	227	the USAO had filed the proposed charges against Epstein, Epstein would have elected to go to trial. In Menchel's view, the USAO therefore had to weigh...
059.pdf	-	232	e case. Menchel told OPR that once in private practice, former colleagues often became adversaries. In Menchel's view, such preexisting relationships ...
059.pdf	-	239	e we have missed something." The requested meeting took place on June 26, 2007. Before the meeting, at Menchel's direction, Villafana provided to the ...
059.pdf	-	241	ims could obtain monetary damages from Epstein. As noted previously, the USAO's original plea offer in Menchel's August 3, 2007 letter expressed a "no...
059.pdf	-	258	ept Menchel, in particular, well informed of her efforts to obtain the computer equipment. She sent to Menchel, or copied him on, several emails about...
059.pdf	-	284	not likely contain information as to "how they would like the case resolved." Villafana asserted that Menchel "never reached out to any of the victims...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	52	26 forward with charges in this case. Lourie forwarded a copy of the prosecution memorandum to Menchel. Lourie’s transmittal message read: Marie did a...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	53	of the discussions. Sloman told OPR that because of his broad responsibilities as FAUSA, he left it to Menchel, as a highly experienced trial attorney...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	55	29 Lourie followed up his email to Villafaña with one to Menchel, in which Lourie reiterated the potential benefits of a pre-indictment plea, explaini...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	56	al investigation and a meeting with senior USAO managers, including Acosta. In a May 10, 2007 email to Menchel, Lourie reported that Epstein’s attorne...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	57	s counsel before filing charges, and suggesting that Epstein’s counsel make their next presentation to Menchel. Although Lourie’s emails show that he ...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	59	he did not recall Villafaña ever articulating a concern that Epstein was continuing to offend, and in Menchel’s view, Epstein was “already under a mic...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	60	ed the state’s case and would “have a significant impact on any federal prosecution.”52 Lourie sent to Menchel, with a copy to Villafaña, an email div...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	69	e had not been given an opportunity to respond to those concerns.69 A week later, Villafaña replied to Menchel’s email, reiterating her concerns about...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	72	lafaña’s efforts to obtain the computer equipment. In May 2007, following the plan she had outlined to Menchel, Villafaña initiated action requiring p...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	73	tion,” and to send “whatever and whoever you need” to assist. 74 Villafaña forwarded Black’s letter to Menchel, explaining the circumstances relating ...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	78	that required him to register as a sexual offender; however, sex offender status was also mentioned in Menchel’s July 3, 2007 email to Villafaña recou...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	81	of the defense team, Sanchez followed up on the July 31, 2007 meeting with an August 2, 2007 letter to Menchel: We welcomed your recognition that a st...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	82	to Sloman, Lourie, and Villafaña. The final letter, as shown on the following pages, was identical to Menchel’s redraft, except that it omitted all re...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	89	RM OF IMPRISONMENT IS REDUCED Acosta had dispensed with the August 17, 2007 plea deadline specified in Menchel’s August 3, 2007 letter, in order to al...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	160	PR did not find a violation of a clear and unambiguous standard as discussed below, OPR concludes that Menchel, Sloman, Lourie, and Villafaña did not ...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	172	the USAO had filed the proposed charges against Epstein, Epstein would have elected to go to trial. In Menchel’s view, the USAO therefore had to weigh...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	177	e case. Menchel told OPR that once in private practice, former colleagues often became adversaries. In Menchel’s view, such preexisting relationships ...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	184	e we have missed something.” The requested meeting took place on June 26, 2007. Before the meeting, at Menchel’s direction, Villafaña provided to the ...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	186	ims could obtain monetary damages from Epstein. As noted previously, the USAO’s original plea offer in Menchel’s August 3, 2007 letter expressed a “no...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	203	ept Menchel, in particular, well informed of her efforts to obtain the computer equipment. She sent to Menchel, or copied him on, several emails about...
2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf	-	229	not likely contain information as to “how they would like the case resolved.” Villafaña asserted that Menchel “never reached out to any of the victims...