CEOS
location 7 mentions 60% confidence
Document Mentions (7)
| Document | Volume | Page | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 059.pdf | - | 141 | d Acosta and Sloman, asking that the USAO "stick to our deadline if possible." Lourie pointed out that CEOS "has no approval authority" and opined it ... |
| 059.pdf | - | 184 | "national iriterest" as defmed by the U.S. Attorney's Manual. In the notification, Senior stated that CEOS "has been involved and is currently reviewi... |
| 059.pdf | - | 188 | riminal violations "would contradict criminal enforcement policy interests." The letter specified that CEOS 's review addressed the "narrow question" ... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 86 | d Acosta and Sloman, asking that the USAO “stick to our deadline if possible.” Lourie pointed out that CEOS “has no approval authority” and opined it ... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 129 | “national interest” as defined by the U.S. Attorney’s Manual. In the notification, Senior stated that CEOS “has been involved and is currently reviewi... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 133 | riminal violations “would contradict criminal enforcement policy interests.” The letter specified that CEOS’s review addressed the “narrow question” o... |
| EFTA00009116.pdf | VOL00007 | 1 | 22.55 portion of it? Do you -- do you remember that issue? A I remember that the issue was appealed to CEOS. Q Okay. Well, it was -- it was appealed i... |