State
location 8 mentions 60% confidence
Also known as: STATE
Document Mentions (8)
| Document | Volume | Page | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 059.pdf | - | 101 | ly 29, 2006, citing statement by State Attorney's Office spokesman Michael Edmondson. 25 Indictment in State v. Epstein, 2006CF9454AXX (July 19, 2006)... |
| 059.pdf | - | 210 | ions in which courts have enforced prosecutors' promises of leniency to third parties. For example, in State v. Frazier, 697 So. 2d 944 (Fla. App. 199... |
| 074.pdf | - | 218 | he custodian in possession of the documents that arc the subject of this action. b. Plaintiff Fails to State a Cause of Action Plaintiff attempts to a... |
| 166.pdf | - | 64 | clined to comment on the case and did not respond to a r~questfor comment Monday. The implication that State .Attqrney)3arry Krischer was easy oil Eps... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 46 | ly 29, 2006, citing statement by State Attorney’s Office spokesman Michael Edmondson. 25 Indictment in State v. Epstein, 2006CF9454AXX (July 19, 2006)... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 155 | ions in which courts have enforced prosecutors’ promises of leniency to third parties. For example, in State v. Frazier, 697 So. 2d 944 (Fla. App. 199... |
| 795 (1).pdf | - | 92 | er Co. v. King, 658 So.2d 518, 520 (Fla. 1995). The showing required to amend is minimal. As stated in State a/Wis. Inv. v. Plantation Squa_i:~-Assoc.... |
| 795.pdf | - | 92 | er Co. v. King, 658 So.2d 518, 520 (Fla. 1995). The showing required to amend is minimal. As stated in State a/Wis. Inv. v. Plantation Squa_i:~-Assoc.... |