Edwards
location 41 mentions 60% confidence
Also known as: EDWARDS
Document Mentions (41)
| Document | Volume | Page | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 059.pdf | - | 356 | ny involvement in victim notification," she felt "prohibited" from providing additional information to Edwards. Sloman told OPR that although neither ... |
| 059.pdf | - | 358 | ntations Villafana made to the victims whom she interviewed on January 31 and February 1, 2008, and to Edwards, were misleading. Therefore, OPR consid... |
| 059.pdf | - | 677 | tion would have likely come out. He says the information will help him undermine Epstein's claims that Edwards "ginned up" the allegations to help his... |
| 074.pdf | - | 92 | tion would have likely come out. He says the information will help him undermine Epstein's claims that Edwards "ginned up" the allegations to help his... |
| 074.pdf | - | 193 | tion would have likely come out. He says the information will help him undermine Epstein's claims that Edwards "ginned up" the allegations to help his... |
| 1251.pdf | - | 133 | NOT A CERTIFIED COPY BATES DATE TO Edwards 08381-08383 09/06/2009 Bradley Edwards 08384-08388 04/13/2009 Bradley Edwards 08389-08397 05/14/200 |
| 1319.pdf | - | 13 | bit A provides a comparison of the 47 e-mails as identified on Epstein's Clerk's Trial Exhibit List to Edwards' privilege log entries. Edwards' comple... |
| 1319.pdf | - | 18 | even more appropriate. The Court has already recognized that some of the documents were detrimental to Edwards' counterclaim and beneficial to Epstein... |
| 1319.pdf | - | 19 | view is inapplicable here, where the e-mails were primarily authored or received by Edwards, and/or in Edwards' possession since 2009. Based on this, ... |
| 1319.pdf | - | 20 | Y chain of custody and possession of the 47 e-mails before Link & Rockenbach appeared in this case. At Edwards' election, upon motion filed by him, Fa... |
| 1319.pdf | - | 23 | d on Epstein's 3/5/18 Clerk's Trial Exhibit List that Epstein seeks an in camera review of compared to Edwards' 2/23/11 Privilege Log 2/2/11 Email fro... |
| 1319.pdf | - | 264 | eeking to obtain documents from the Trustee, which included documents from attorney Edwards related to Edwards' representation of the sex abuse victim... |
| 1338.pdf | - | 5 | iduals and 4 general categories (Operative List) (Exhibit B). In his July 12, 2017, Interrogatories to Edwards, Epstein attempted to discover the subj... |
| 1338.pdf | - | 9 | ugh the trial was postponed in light of the appellate stay, the Court now should address the abuses in Edwards' Witness List, as the parties prepare f... |
| 1417.pdf | - | 5 | was hollow. Although Farmer Jaffe did in fact tum over purported work product specifically relating to Edwards' three clients' cases against Epstein, ... |
| 1417.pdf | - | 8 | 30 highly relevant, case-ending e-mails either authored or received by Edwards, and undeniably within Edwards' possession since 2009. Based on this, E... |
| 1417.pdf | - | 9 | ccomplished"). Not only are the e-mails highly relevant and constitute no Binger "surprise in fact" to Edwards, as this Court has already glimpsed upo... |
| 1417.pdf | - | 11 | correspondence to the United States during plea negotiations). Moreover, this Court's conclusion that Edwards' waiver of any protection is further man... |
| 1417.pdf | - | 16 | ein, that he acted properly in the litigation and that there is nothing to demonstrate any weakness in Edwards' now- settled three clients' cases agai... |
| 1417.pdf | - | 17 | ty as claimed by Edwards cannot be blamed on the allegations in the Complaint, but are attributable to Edwards' voluntary association with Rothstein a... |
| 146.pdf | - | 80 | ation would have likely come out. He says the information Willhelp him undermine Epstein’s claims that Edwards “ginned up” the allegations to help his... |
| 153.pdf | - | 82 | tion would have likely come out. He says,the information will help him undermine Epstein’s claims that Edwards “ginned up” the allegations to help his... |
| 153.pdf | - | 84 | hat he will hc_lv~ to decide before the case· ·go~es to trial, Des_pite· ,Scarola' s ihifisterice that Edwards. h~d:no.thing to do, with. Rothstein!s ... |
| 166.pdf | - | 92 | tion would have likely come out. He says the information will help him undermine Epstein’s claims that Edwards “ginned up” the allegations to help his... |
| 171.pdf | - | 142 | ation would have likely come out. He says th&information will help him undermine Epstein’s claims that Edwards “ginned up” the allegations to help; hi... |
| 171.pdf | - | 144 | us motions that he will have to decide before the case goes to trial. Despite Scarolls insistence that Edwards h,a_d nothi:ng to do with Rothstein's P... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 301 | ny involvement in victim notification,” she felt “prohibited” from providing additional information to Edwards. Sloman told OPR that although neither ... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 303 | ntations Villafaña made to the victims whom she interviewed on January 31 and February 1, 2008, and to Edwards, were misleading. Therefore, OPR consid... |
| 205.pdf | - | 79 | tion would have likely come out. He says the information will help him undermine Epstein's claims that Edwards "ginned up" the allegations to help his... |
| 795 (1).pdf | - | 4 | ad sufficient evidence to proceed with claims of wrongdoing against Edwards. In truth, as reflected in Edwards' deposition and his supplemental affida... |
| 795 (1).pdf | - | 30 | abuse of his clients. However, the U.S. Attorney's Office, declined to provide any such information to Edwards. It similarly declined to provide any s... |
| 795 (1).pdf | - | 68 | NOT A CERTIFIED COPY represented them in a civil action against Epstein. Nothing in Edwards's capable and competent representation of his clients can ... |
| 795 (1).pdf | - | 94 | - and Edwards properly and successfully represented them in a civil action against Epstein. Nothing in Edwards's capable and competent representation ... |
| 795 (1).pdf | - | 107 | n Edwards' Affidavit. Epstein also fails to meet the second element of an abuse of process claim: that Edwards -,had.'·some sort -of ulterior motive; ... |
| 795 (1).pdf | - | 286 | kay. Let me -- let me -- yeah, this one, probably just because it intrigued me, is from Bill Berger to Edwards, Adler, Jaffe, Weissing, Farmer, May I ... |
| 795.pdf | - | 4 | ad sufficient evidence to proceed with claims of wrongdoing against Edwards. In truth, as reflected in Edwards' deposition and his supplemental affida... |
| 795.pdf | - | 30 | abuse of his clients. However, the U.S. Attorney's Office, declined to provide any such information to Edwards. It similarly declined to provide any s... |
| 795.pdf | - | 68 | NOT A CERTIFIED COPY represented them in a civil action against Epstein. Nothing in Edwards's capable and competent representation of his clients can ... |
| 795.pdf | - | 94 | - and Edwards properly and successfully represented them in a civil action against Epstein. Nothing in Edwards's capable and competent representation ... |
| 795.pdf | - | 107 | n Edwards' Affidavit. Epstein also fails to meet the second element of an abuse of process claim: that Edwards -,had.'·some sort -of ulterior motive; ... |
| 795.pdf | - | 286 | kay. Let me -- let me -- yeah, this one, probably just because it intrigued me, is from Bill Berger to Edwards, Adler, Jaffe, Weissing, Farmer, May I ... |